Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. J Voice. Jan pii: S(17) doi: Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). 25 Aug Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice ( CAPE-V). Zraick RI(1), Kempster GB, Connor NP, Thibeault S.
|Published (Last):||7 February 2018|
|PDF File Size:||10.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice.
Generate a file for use with external citation management software. For all four raters, the differences in the six CAPE-V parameters between the study and the control groups were found to be statistically significant.
Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express evaluatoin permission.
Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices.
Published by Elsevier Inc. Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing auditory-perceptuual Voice Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester.
The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice. For the future application of this study, it would be important to investigate whether cepstral measures correlate with the auditory-perceptual judgments of dysphonia severity collected by a Turkish version of the CAPE-V. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Users should consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
The overall severity parameter had the highest intrarater and inter-reliability values for all the participants. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy.
This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices. Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders. However, remote access to EBSCO’s databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution.
Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
There was no difference found between the organic and functional voice disorders in terms of the CAPE-V scores. A Training and Reliability Study. The Americleft Speech Project: The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. Showing of 9 ccape-v citations. Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners’ ratings of severity consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v dysphonia?
Presentations referencing similar topics. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment evaluatin synthesized voice quality. This abstract may be abridged.
Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Add to My Bibliography. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. The different types of voice disorders, classified as organic and functional disorders, were compared in terms of their CAPE-V scores.